s Man bites dog – mongrel rules needed | I2P: Information to Pharmacists - Archive
Publication Date 01/07/2014         Volume. 6 No. 6   
Information to Pharmacists


From the desk of the editor

Welcome to the July 2014 homepage edition of i2P (Information to Pharmacists) E-Magazine.
At the commencement of 2014 i2P focused on the need for the entire profession of pharmacy and its associated industry supports to undergo a renewal and regeneration.
We are now half-way through this year and it is quite apparent that pharmacy leaders do not yet have a cohesive and clear sense of direction.
Maybe the new initiative by Woolworths to deliver clinical service through young pharmacists and nurses may sharpen their focus.
If not, community pharmacy can look forward to losing a substantial and profitable market share of the clinical services market.
Who would you blame when that happens?
But I have to admit there is some effort, even though the results are but meagre.
In this edition of i2P we focus on the need for research about community pharmacy, the lack of activity from practicing pharmacists and when some research is delivered, a disconnect appears in its interpretation and implementation.

read more
open full screen

Recent Comments

Click here to read...

News Flash

Newsflash Updates for July 2014

Newsflash Updates

Regular weekly updates that supplement the regular monthly homepage edition of i2P. 
Access and click on the title links that are illustrated

Comments: 1

read more
open full screen

Feature Contribution

Woolworths Pharmacy - Getting One Stage Closer

Neil Johnston

It started with “tablet” computers deployed on shelves inside the retailer Coles, specifically to provide information to consumers relating to pain management and the sale of strong analgesics.
This development was reported in i2P under the title Coles Pharmacy Expansion and the Arid PGA Landscape”
In that article we reported that qualified information was a missing link that had come out of Coles market research as the reason to why it had not succeeded in dominating the pain market.
Of course, Woolworths was working on the same problem at the same time and had come up with a better solution - real people with good information.

Comments: 5

read more
open full screen

Intensive Exposition without crossing over with a supermarket

Fiona Sartoretto Verna AIAPP

Editor's Note: The understanding of a pharmacy's presentation through the research that goes into the design of fixtures and fittings that highlight displays, is a never-ending component of pharmacy marketing.
Over the past decade, Australian pharmacy shop presentations have fallen behind in standards of excellence.
It does not take rocket science - you just have to open your eyes.
Recently, our two major supermarkets, Woolworths and Coles, have entered into the field of drug and condition information provision - right into the heartland of Australian Pharmacy.

read more
open full screen

The sure way to drive business away

Gerald Quigley

I attended the Pregnancy, Baby and Children’s Expo in Brisbane recently.
What an eye and ear opening event that was!
Young Mums, mature Mums, partners of all ages, grandparents and friends……...many asking about health issues and seeking reassurances that they were doing the right thing.

Comments: 1

read more
open full screen

‘Marketing Based Medicine’ – how bad is it?

Baz Bardoe

It should be the scandal of the century.
It potentially affects the health of almost everyone.
Healthcare providers and consumers alike should be up in arms. But apart from coverage in a few credible news sources the problem of ‘Marketing Based Medicine,’ as psychiatrist Dr Peter Parry terms it, hasn’t as yet generated the kind of universal outrage one might expect.

read more
open full screen

Community Pharmacy Research - Are You Involved?

Mark Coleman

Government funding is always scarce and restricted.
If you are ever going to be a recipient of government funds you will need to fortify any application with evidence.
From a government perspective, this minimises risk.
I must admit that while I see evidence of research projects being managed by the PGA, I rarely see community pharmacists individually and actively engaged in the type of research that would further their own aims and objectives (and survival).

read more
open full screen

Organisational Amnesia and the Lack of a Curator Inhibits Cultural Progress

Neil Johnston

Most of us leave a tremendous impact on pharmacies we work for (as proprietors, managers, contractors or employees)—in ways we’re not even aware of.
But organisational memories are often all too short, and without a central way to record that impact and capture the knowledge and individual contributions, they become lost to time.
It is ironic that technology has provided us with phenomenal tools for communication and connection, but much of it has also sped up our work lives and made knowledge and memory at work much more ephemeral.

read more
open full screen

Academics on the payroll: the advertising you don't see

Staff Writer

This article was first published in The Conversation and was written by Wendy Lipworth, University of Sydney and Ian Kerridge, University of Sydney
In the endless drive to get people’s attention, advertising is going ‘native’, creeping in to places formerly reserved for editorial content. In this Native Advertising series we find out what it looks like, if readers can tell the difference, and more importantly, whether they care.
i2P has republished the article as it supports our own independent and ongoing investigations on how drug companies are involved in marketing-based medicine rather than evidence-based medicine.

read more
open full screen

I’ve been thinking about admitting wrong.

Mark Neuenschwander

Editor's Note: This is an early article by Mark Neuenschwander we have republished after the soul-searching surrounding a recent Australian dispensing error involving methotrexate.
Hmm. There’s more than one way you could take that, huh? Like Someday when I get around to it (I’m not sure) I may admit that I was wrong about something. Actually, I’ve been thinking about the concept of admitting wrong. So don’t get your hopes up. No juicy confessions this month except that I wish it were easier for me to admit when I have been wrong or made a mistake.
Brian Goldman, an ER physician from Toronto, is host of the award-winning White Coat, Black Art on CBC Radio and slated to deliver the keynote at The unSUMMIT for Bedside Barcoding in Anaheim this May. His TED lecture, entitled, “Doctors make mistakes. Can we talk about it?” had already been viewed by 386,072 others before I watched it last week.

read more
open full screen

Dispensing errors – a ripple effect of damage

Kay Dunkley - BPharm, Grad Dip Hosp Pharm, Grad Dip Health Admin, MPS, MSHPA

Most readers will be aware of recent publicity relating to dispensing errors and in particular to deaths caused by methotrexate being incorrectly packed in dose administration aids.
The Pharmacy Board of Australia (PBA), in its Communique of 13 June 2014, described a methotrexate packing error leading to the death of a patient and noted “extra vigilance is required to be exercised by pharmacists with these drugs”.
This same case was reported by A Current Affair (ACA) in its program on Friday 20 June

read more
open full screen

Take a vacation from your vocation

Harvey Mackay

Have you ever had one of those days when all you could think was, “Gosh, do I need a vacation.”
Of course you have – because all work and no play aren’t good for anyone.
A vacation doesn’t have to be two weeks on a tropical island, or even a long weekend at the beach. 
A vacation just means taking a break from your everyday activities. 
A change of pace. 
It doesn’t matter where.
Everyone needs a vacation to rejuvenate mentally and physically. 
But did you also know that you can help boost our economy by taking some days off? 
Call it your personal stimulus package.

read more
open full screen

Explainer: what is peer review?

Staff Writer

This article was first published in the Conversation. It caught our eye because "peer review" it is one of the standards for evidence-based medicines that has also been corrupted by global pharma.
The article is republished by i2P as part of its ongoing investigation into scientific fraud and was writtenby Andre Spicer, City University London and Thomas Roulet, University of Oxford
We’ve all heard the phrase “peer review” as giving credence to research and scholarly papers, but what does it actually mean?
How does it work?
Peer review is one of the gold standards of science. It’s a process where scientists (“peers”) evaluate the quality of other scientists' work. By doing this, they aim to ensure the work is rigorous, coherent, uses past research and adds to what we already knew.
Most scientific journals, conferences and grant applications have some sort of peer review system. In most cases it is “double blind” peer review. This means evaluators do not know the author(s), and the author(s) do not know the identity of the evaluators.
The intention behind this system is to ensure evaluation is not biased.
The more prestigious the journal, conference, or grant, the more demanding will be the review process, and the more likely the rejection. This prestige is why these papers tend to be more read and more cited.

read more
open full screen

Dentists from the dark side?

Loretta Marron OAM BSc

While dining out with an elderly friend, I noticed that he kept his false tooth plate in his shirt pocket. He had recently had seven amalgam-filled teeth removed, because he believed that their toxins were making him sick; but his new plate was uncomfortable. He had been treated by an 'holistic dentist'. Claiming to offer a "safe and healthier alternative" to conventional dentistry, are they committed to our overall health and wellbeing or are they promoting unjustified fear, unnecessarily extracting teeth and wasting our money?

read more
open full screen

Planning for Profit in 2015 – Your key to Business Success

Chris Foster

We are now entering a new financial year and it’s a great time to reflect on last year and highlight those things that went well and those that may have impacted negatively in the pursuit of your goals.
It's also a great to spend some time re-evaluating your personal and business short, medium and long term goals in the light of events over the last year.
The achievement of your goals will in many cases be dependent on setting and aspiring to specific financial targets. It's important that recognise that many of your personal goals will require you to generate sufficient business profits to fund those aspirations

read more
open full screen

ReWalk™ Personal Exoskeleton System Cleared by FDA for Home Use

Staff Writer

Exoskeleton leader ReWalk Robotics announced today that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has cleared the company’s ReWalk Personal System for use at home and in the community.
ReWalk is a wearable robotic exoskeleton that provides powered hip and knee motion to enable individuals with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) to stand upright and walk.
ReWalk, the only exoskeleton with FDA clearance via clinical studies and extensive performance testing for personal use, is now available throughout the United States.

read more
open full screen

Attracting and Retaining Great People

Barry Urquhart

Welcome to the new financial year in Australia.
For many in business the past year has been described as a challenging period.
Adjectives are a key feature of the English language.  In the business lexicon their use can be, and often is evocative and stimulate creative images.  But they can also contribute to inexact, emotional perceptions.
Throughout the financial pages of newspapers and business magazines adjectives abound.
References to “hot” money draw attention and comment.  The recent wave of funds from Chinese investors, keen to remove their wealth from the jurisdiction and control of government regulations is creating a potential property bubble in Australia.

read more
open full screen

Updating Your Values - Extending Your Culture

Neil Johnston

Pharmacy culture is dormant.
Being comprised of values, unless each value is continually addressed, updated or deleted, entire organisations can stagnate (or entire professions such as the pharmacy profession).
Good values offer a strong sense of security, knowing that if you operate within the boundaries of your values, you will succeed in your endeavours.

read more
open full screen

Evidence-based medicine is broken. Why we need data and technology to fix it

Staff Writer

The following article is reprinted from The Conversation and forms up part of our library collection on evidence-based medicines.
At i2P we also believe that the current model of evidence is so fractured it will never be able to be repaired.
All that can happen is that health professionals should independently test and verify through their own investigations what evidence exists to prescribe a medicine of any potency.
Health professionals that have patients (such as pharmacists) are ideally placed to observe and record the efficacy for medicines.
All else should confine their criticisms to their evidence of the actual evidence published.
If there are holes in it then share that evidence with the rest of the world.
Otherwise, do not be in such a hurry to criticise professions that have good experience and judgement to make a good choice on behalf of their patients, simply because good evidence has not caught up with reality.

read more
open full screen

Laropiprant is the Bad One; Niacin is/was/will always be the Good One

Staff Writer

Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, July 25, 2014
Laropiprant is the Bad One; Niacin is/was/will always be the Good One
by W. Todd Penberthy, PhD

(OMNS July 25, 2014) Niacin has been used for over 60 years in tens of thousands of patients with tremendously favorable therapeutic benefit (Carlson 2005).
In the first-person NY Times best seller, "8 Weeks to a Cure for Cholesterol," the author describes his journey from being a walking heart attack time bomb to a becoming a healthy individual.
He hails high-dose niacin as the one treatment that did more to correct his poor lipid profile than any other (Kowalski 2001).

read more
open full screen

Culture Drive & Pharmacy Renewal

Neil Johnston

Deep within all of us we have a core set of values and beliefs that create the standards of behaviour that we align with when we set a particular direction in life.
Directions may change many times over a lifetime, but with life experiences and maturity values may increase in number or gain greater depth.
All of this is embraced under one word – “culture”.
When a business is born it will only develop if it has a sound culture, and the values that comprise that culture are initially inherent in the business founder.
A sound business culture equates to a successful business and that success is often expressed in the term “goodwill” which can be eventually translated to a dollar value.

read more
open full screen

ReWalk™ Personal Exoskeleton System Cleared by FDA for Home Use

Staff Writer

Exoskeleton leader ReWalk Robotics announced today that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has cleared the company’s ReWalk Personal System for use at home and in the community.
ReWalk is a wearable robotic exoskeleton that provides powered hip and knee motion to enable individuals with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) to stand upright and walk.
ReWalk, the only exoskeleton with FDA clearance via clinical studies and extensive performance testing for personal use, is now available throughout the United States.

read more
open full screen

Pharmacy 2014 - Pharmacy Management Conference

Neil Johnston

The brave new world of health and wellness is not the enemy of Pharmacy, it is its champion.
Australian futurist, Morris Miselowski, one of the world's leading business visionaries, will present the Opening Keynote address on Pharmacy's Future in the new Health and Wellness Landscape at 2.00pm on Wednesday July 30.
Morris believes the key to better health care could already be in your pocket, with doctors soon set to prescribe iPhone apps, instead of pills.
Technology will revolutionise the health industry - a paradigm shift from healthcare to personal wellness.
Health and wellness applications on smartphones are already big news, and are dramatically changing the way we manage our personal health and everyday wellness.

read more
open full screen

Generation and Application of Community Pharmacy Research

Neil Johnston

Editor’s Note: We have had a number of articles in this issue relating to pharmacy research.
The PGA has conducted a number of research initiatives over the years, including one recently reported in Pharmacy News that resulted from an analysis of the QCPP Patient Questionnaire.
Pharmacy Guild president, George Tambassis, appears to have authored the article following, and there also appears to be a disconnect between the survey report and its target audience illustrated by one of the respondent comments published.
I have asked Mark Coleman to follow through, elaborate and comment:

read more
open full screen

Man bites dog – mongrel rules needed

Pat Gallagher

articles by this author...

Patrick Gallagher is well known in Information Technology circles. He has a vital interest in e-health, particularly in the area of shared records and e-prescriptions, also supply chain issues. He maintains a very clear vision of what ought to be, but he and many others in the IT field, are frustrated by government agencies full of experts who have never actually worked in a professional health setting. So we see ongoing wastage, astronomical spends and "top down" systems that are never going to work. Patrick needs to be listened to.

Here I am.
Back from another lengthy and self enforced break and reporting in i2P on things and matters with ICT in pharmacy-land and health generally.
It is not that I am lazy.
It is that there hasn’t been much ‘news’ happening worth getting our knickers in a knot.
It is all the same old; same old in e-health playing field and that is rather uninspiring to say the least. So I have taken the view that if there is nothing positive to say it’s best to stay stum.
But now as 2011 is coming to a rattling death perhaps there are some things worth saying, usefully or otherwise.
What is a snapshot of some of the year’s achievements in the e-health community?
Hard to say that the world is on fire with overwhelming success, but a summary of the activities that might interest the i2P reader, in some order of oomph are:

* The Wave 1 PCEHR demonstration or development sites were created;

* The Wave 2 PCEHR demonstration or development  sites were created;

* The $400 million Health Identifier Service is in play;

* The PCEHR project is on everyone’s lips;

* The NPC (you should know the acronym) is being created;

* The ETP (ditto this acronym) specification is nearly ready for peer review by the standards community and consisted of six separate documents totaling  over 1000 pages;

* We still have work to do in secure messaging; and

* Nothing has actually worked (half empty), or failed (half full) to proceed, yet

Having more than my share of self nurtured cynicism it is rather easy to be a pot-shooter at the way ‘we’ are going about implementing e-health in Australia. I would prefer though to use cannon and say that we have spent over a $1billion and there isn’t much to see in terms of real world change.

It is over ten years since the National E-Health Summit was held. Over five years since NEHTA came into being. During the past three years we have had several hard hitting and very detailed reports with oodles of sensible recommendations and yet, as we approach 2012, we still have a very large inverted pyramid, teetering on a very narrow point of balance at the workplace level.

The upside base of that $1 billion pyramid is wide and deep with top down activity, with little coal face demonstrable change.

That is not to say that there aren’t islands of commercial success. Independent sites were the vendors and users have just got on and made things better, without any big brother involvement, because it makes business sense to do so.

To get a reasonable snapshot of this overall situation take a look at the NeHTA website and read the latest Annual Report published just this month. Without wishing to influence your take-away after reading the document I will say that it reads, still, like a prospectus. Flashy, eye catching, promising a lot with lots of fine print; but is there a scorecard to indicate actual change? Nope.

Let’s take a look at the landscape.

The most promising activity we have today, that involves process and practice change, is the Wave site concept. As with all my contributions I will keep it brief and expect you to ask if you do not know what (a Wave site) is.  Fingers crossed they deliver. Because they are closer to impacting on the real world than anything that has happened over the last ten years.

During my data capture business career, introducing technology-based change management outcomes, there were two words we never used to describe a new project that was (say) replacing order books with bar-coded data capture.

One was ‘pilot’ and the other ‘trial’.

That was because it was never the technology that was in question; the technology mostly proved itself to be ‘better’ – it was the people factor. Where people had to accept and embrace a work practice change. If the project was introduced as a pilot or as trial there was an instant reaction of –

“Oh well, it isn’t really going to happen, so why bother”.

Apathy and/or fear are always a powerful and constant barrier to success. 

The Wave sites, thank goodness, have been implementated as ‘demonstration’ sites’. Thereby giving a platform to road test and gradually define change and its inevitable tweaking as an ongoing shared experience between implementers and users. 

So we can give higher scoring points for the Wave sites than is usually the case and hopefully they might just deliver valuable and harmonized benefits.

It must also be said that a welcome and rare benefit is that some of the local SME vendors got a Wave site guernsey. This is not the norm. So for a really good change these vendor battlers got a (small) seat at the funding trough, err table, or dare I say gravy train.

Identifiers! I said above ‘in play’ and that’s pretty much the case. As we are all too aware technology and ‘machines’ need unique identifiers to process data. In health, as in most situations, that includes the who, the where, the what and the *why.

We need to identify people; both patients as well as service deliverers and care givers. Your pharmacy, a surgery or a hospital has to be known for electronic transactions and processing. That the transaction is a prescription or a discharge summary needs to be known and finally why a service is being delivered, which comes down to how is the claim going to be *paid and by whom.

Older readers will remember the ‘Australia card’ hullabaloo. All readers understand the MediCare numbering system. But how many Australians realize that we now all have been issued with an IHI; an Individual Health Identifier? Well we have and yet few of the hoi polloi have the faintest idea what this means. 

This problem clearly is that, outside the Wave sites, us Prols do not know that the new individual personal number will ‘soon’ replace the existing, generally family structured, Medicare number system. And this IHI will be used for all healthcare services and importantly, the subsequent health records.

It should be a concern that this planned ‘rollout’ is still much of an insider’s wet dream. Until we can all be electronically identified not much can happen – for good or for naught – and until we all have an IHI in play we are not yet on the starting blocks, at best.

Which leads to the PCEHR?

When I think of a PCEHR, in terms of my experience and prejudices, I hear an old joke. Whereby a certain community of a flavour of Christianity believes that sex is bad, because it might lead to dancing.

Perhaps this PCEHR, as we know it, offers a similar reverse analogy – dancing to this music may lead to an unintentional bad end

The first thing to know is that the ‘plan’ calls for the IHI to start becoming a real rollout event by 1 July, 2012. A little over six months away. As we are over 21 million people and counting, the scenario of all having an IHI ‘in time’ seems very remote. Before you ask, is ‘in time’ by 2013 or 2015? I don’t know.

Moreover the funding stops at the end of June 2012 and what happens next is not public knowledge. 

The thing to focus on here is the E, the H and the R words (I’ll come to the P and the C, below).

Electronic (E) processing mandatorily requires a machine to machine identification number; no number, no transaction. And, this needs to be the high end identifier on each and every transaction.

Then we have what was delivered (H). Who got the script, what were the test results, who was discharged, who is being referred and of course who just died.

Lastly we have the ongoing history and list of (R) events. Not much is usefully available for listing without an IHI to tie it to.

Of course, somewhat similar to the pilot/trail failure phenomena above, those who don’t like (whatever) is happening can use the IHI as a powerful weapon to prevent or to slow down change. The words they use are of course ‘security’, ‘privacy’ and not forgetting variations of the big bad bogie man.

To get around this formidable obstacle, the governors, the committees, the leaders, the directors or whoever is calling the shots, decided to introduce P and C as a high order identifying solution to allay all fears and robust hand braking.

What isn’t clear is the fear of failure stronger than the fear of success?

Perhaps there is too much twee going on. Someone, somewhere, needs to get a dose of mongrel into the process or we might all drown in work-around plots and pussy-footing.

It is just too easy to replace Personal with Political and Controlled with Correct to explain what has happened. It does, and it does explain regardless whether you are a cynic like me or not. It is easy to see that the loading of the P and the C soothers in front of EHR is just a lot of lead in the saddle bags of any simply effective and understandable (by said Prols) EHR development.

A reasonable person can swap ‘lead in the saddle bags’ for ‘complex’ if that is the polite way to explain the problem.

Essentially here is the simple rub. The patient entity has an opt-in, or opt-out option and that simply means you, me, him and her are in charge. We, not an authority of any kind, will decide whether there will be a (PC) EHR at all and whether the PCEHR will be complete. The immediate effect is to dilute and devalue the vital intention of delivering the benefits of e-health. If it isn’t complete, well, it isn’t complete enough to be used reliably.

To oil the wheels and accomplish this PC safety net there are rules and methods that I struggle to understand (and I attended two days of conferencing the issues); to assume that all levels of Australian society will understand, let alone embrace, a (PC) EHR is very questionable. But dear reader that isn’t the real problem.

The real problem is that beside the less contentious right to opt-in or opt-out, is the right to ‘control’ the system. The patient has the right to allow or disallow the recording of any or all personal medical activity. In simple terms; allow the recording of the script for Diabex but delete the record of any prescription for Viagra, as an example.

This subject matter is worthy of a lengthy article on its own but as this is a brief overview let me close on why this PCEHR barrier won’t go away.

Just as you would not (well would you?) allow a patient to decide what is, or isn’t recorded on their medication record within your dispensary system (think about it), the anecdotal view of the average GPs take on the patient control factor is a strong forgetaboutit. As they author prescriptions it is a very serious factor.

That the records will  be incomplete, for various reasons, is the #1 issue for GPs. Issue #2 then leads, reasonably in my view, that any diagnosis that cannot rely on the veracity and completeness of the patient’s record is ‘dangerous’. Not just in the obvious clinical meaning of dangerous but also the medico-legal meaning of dangerous.

So much then for any likely wins for anyone much in this space. As no one has asked me or many others for advice I will refrain from boring you with where the answer lies.  (Just think – keep it simple, deliver user benefits and work from the bottom up, one step at a time).

One place to look, and not to put the boot in any harder than necessary, is the UK. If you have been in any way across the e-heath ‘news’ you will know the UK has just dumped, after many years and $billions, their similar EHR plans. We can only hope our governors with this PCEHR responsibility have spent a lot of time in the UK benchmarking what happened there, with what is planned, to happen here.

What fun. Not.

Like an IHI regime being in place, the total e-health journey, from supply to consumption, to records (your medication records and into other EHR platforms) requires there is one, single, reliable, harmonized and available PRODUCT identifier, or any EHR is going to be flawed.

Way back in 2002 this was addressed by the Medicine Coding Council of Australia. Today it’s the MCCA presence has morphed into the NPC (oh, all right – the National Product Catalouge).

Unfortunately this is not the only product source data catalogue in use. Moreover the NPC is not in use for the EHR application – just the supply chain function. And therefore this is a huge flaw in the plan to rollout a PCEHR starting in July 2012.

Put simply it is a lengthy subject to understand properly, in the meantime we should remember this clue:

“every clinical decision is a procurement decision’’.

Meaning the decision to prescribe, is the decision to then use and trigger the ordering and resupply of a product. Because we are transacting in an ‘E’ world, and not with human interpretive and translated data, we must have one, single identifier, from womb to tomb, that does not require re-keying. And for efficiency sake the number should be barcode readable

What do we have?

Most of the dispensary systems use proprietary databases maintained by the system vendors. Nothing wrong with that. Then there is the use of the PBS codes where applicable and mandatory. Fully understandable as well.

These numbers are not machine-readable; nor aligned or electronically useful for an EHR. The proprietary numbers are not uniquely suitable for a cross-referenced EHR, and the PBS number isn’t usable for non-PBS items.

Then we have the AMT (Australian Medical Terminology) which has been developed for clinical purposes; it fails to automatically link the three elements in the data reticulation chain – supply, clinical and records – because it won’t be used in supply functions, nor is machine readable, the AMT will therefore need to be mapped or re-worked in some manner. It has a place but is not the practical answer.

Adding to this are the two (of many) Australian databases that can help solve the problem. One is the NPC. The other is the TGA. Neither is perfect. One has to be perfect for e-health and for PCEHR to deliver timely, accurate and usefully reliable, product related patient records.

The sooner we merge or deliver a perfect version of one catalouge the sooner the EHR records can be reliably and usefully populated.

Oh and what number should be used? Long standing readers will know I have covered this matter many times in i2P to the point of becoming a caricature of a nagger.

There are many on offer. The three that matter as I said above are: a) PBS; b) AMT; and c) GS1 (GTIN). Only one says ‘yes’ more often and that is the GTIN.

A compelling reason is that the GTIN is the responsibility of the source manufacturer/supplier to maintain (no third party) and is the only number that is barcode printed on the packaging. Happy to discuss. Because otherwise mapping is needed and that means re-working source data and that means errors.

Above I also added in the bullet of - ‘secure messaging’.

As obvious as this is dear friend we are not necessarily on the same technology page with the rest of the ICT world. It is very true that if we can’t rely on data, identifying us as patients and what clinical events have befallen us, all being used in a secure and private manner, then good night nurse. No need to keep on dancing, is there?

Here is the rub. One of  the perennial faults of the health community is the mantra that as health is especially complex (sic) and precious (sic) there needs to be clean sheet and we need to reinvent and ignore the developments from elsewhere in the ICT world. This, with the exception of HL7 and similar standards that are fit for purpose, is more or less rubbish. There needs to be more learn-and-use and less - ‘we know better’ - when it comes to technology that crosses IM ‘borders’.

This island mindset says that the ATO, the banks, the insurance and financial industries and may I say Defence, have not developed suitable methodologies to protect data content over the web so that the transaction is vulnerable to misadventure.

A case in point is a PKI; a digital signature. Surely we can surf off the rest of the web-based world here?  But no, we are designing a (well two actually) separate health only version (s) for what is a globally standard tool – the mongrel in me asks - why this is so?

An oldie to remember in this context is this statement:

The past is a rehearsal for the future’;

All the necessary web security tools exist. We merely have to put them in place, with perhaps some modification for the nuances in the health community.

But no siree, we have organizations writing new specifications, organisations setting new standards and others inventing rules and regulations that are not seamlessly interoperable to all other platforms of secure, private and sensitive ICT/web based exchange systems. Give me strength. GGRRRRR!

Let me repeat, it will be better for all if we merely modified what the world is already using, rather than add time, complexity, cost and interoperability barriers to a practical outcome. Meanwhile be in no doubt that there are many participants that will argue this point of view until the cows come home. And in a world where health is a separate planet, where time and money have no restrictions, they might have a case.

But after working for ten years these folk have not yet delivered the fundamentals of internet security, for health transactions. While other industry sectors have long ago made ‘it’ work. Says heaps about the mindset. A mindset of re-creating what already works in an attempt to deliver utopia. This yellow brick road is long, and to date, without a destination any side of a visible horizon.

Enough.  Enough already. The teasing stops here.

Let’s wrap this up just in terms of pharmacy. And we will leave the rest of the swamp to be drained by others better informed and capable than me.

That said I often wonder who on high has asked the question as to:

“what is it we want to do with ICT e-health tools?’

Followed by:

“what is stopping us from achieving that goal?”

The answer to the first question seems to me to “too much”. Rather than start small and grow tall we are working backwards and down from the theoretical stratosphere. That we may never reach back up to the lofty destination, as occurred in the UK, does not yet appear to be on the collective radar.

However in the community pharmacy context the answer to the second question is “not much”. Whatever the goal is of a PCEHR in pharmacy it can be pretty much done today. Given an IHI and a few tweaks.

* A GP can print and send a prescription over the web.

* Australia has two ETP vendors that will do that for them

These two vendors have world class software and benchmarked performance pedigrees – that is, it works!

Their transaction hubs are secure

Your dispensary systems can receive and process these transactions

You already transmit and claim the PBS component of the data

In Dick and Jane terms Australian pharmacy is already capable of contributing data into a PCEHR. With as I said, some tweaks. And when we consider that more Australians receive more prescriptions than any other clinical event it seems passing strange that this hasn’t been the bedrock strategy from the get-go.

That said the thing to fix still is that the product ID/NPC/TGA matter has to be resolved so that individual pharmacy medication records can be uploaded into a seamless and national PCEHR platform. A mandatory component

Secondly all your dispensary patients will have to know, and be able to use, their IHI. Is this mandatory? One would think so. Can it be done today? Aside from the Wave sites – the answer seem to be - nope

The governors then have to be responsible for the security and privacy of all data transacted. Certainly this is mandatory and not especially hard given what already exists in ICT-land.

And now we get to the sticky bits. Your client/patient has to opt-in and give permission for you to reticulate their records; and to instruct you as to who can see what detail in those records. If they want to hide their prescriptions relating to their HIV status they can do so.

Secondly is the issue of PCEHR database (s). We all have a rudimentary idea of how banks and other institutions can identify us, verify and protect data and then store and remove the data as and when authorized, and as appropriately required.

Well, honestly, I am not alone in struggling with understanding how this is going to work in terms of linking PCEHR sites. Where will this blancmange of numerous data mountains be stored? How will data be cross referenced and obtained. And, and, and, and……!.

Hence the title above. If a man does bite a dog and requires distemper shots (it can happen), how will that end up in a PCEHR?

Herein lies the dog poop in the crown.

So the best we can do is wait and see what happens closer to July 2012. Will the dog poop become a jewel? Will a PC focused (regardless of whether it is controlled or correct) EHR dazzle us all?

Time will tell.

And there isn’t much time or money left to play with.

Return to home

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

health news headlines provided courtesy of Medical News Today.

Click here to

If any difficulty is found in subscribing, please use the "Contact Us" panel found in the navigation bar with the message "subscribe" and your email address.

Subscribe to our mailing list

Email Format


  • Copyright (C) 2000-2020 Computachem Services, All Rights Reserved.

Website by Ablecode